Where are they coming from?
August 2, 1999
For most sites, the largest single source of traffic will be
AOL. For the Web Developer's Journal (which is aimed at
intermediate-to-expert computer users), it's about 4%. Since
AOL has a consumer slant, one usually assumes that visitors
coming from AOL are more likely to be computer beginners than
experts. The more your site appeals to the less
computer-savvy, the higher a percentage of AOL hits you should
see. If the thought of all those beginning Web surfers makes
you see dollar signs, but your AOL traffic is in the single
digits, then here's an area to work on. Make sure you're
listed in AOL's directory, AOL Netfind, and consider adding
content that will make AOLers feel welcome (a big flashing
logo that says "Welcome AOL users?" - I don't know).
Behind AOL you'll see some of the other mega-ISPs, such as
Uunet, Mindspring and Netcom. Here's a tip for you: Our
traffic from Time Warner's Road Runner service has gone from
zero to about 1.2% in a year or so. I don't know what that
means for building traffic, but it sounds like a stock to buy!
Top Users
If your site traffic is high, then any entity that makes it
onto the list of top users is unlikely to be a human. Most of
these will be either a
spider or a
cache. A spider is an
automated program that visits your site for the purpose of
indexing it for a search engine. Obviously, spiders are
welcome, but they won't be buying anything (a bit like
journalists, actually), so it's interesting to get a rough
idea of what percentage of your traffic is being "lost" to
spiders.
Some large ISPs "cache" frequently-requested pages (that is,
store them on their local machines instead of retrieving them
from the Web each time they're requested), in order to save
bandwidth. Caching is an important issue if you run an
advertising-supported site, because page impressions delivered
from a server cache will not be counted by your ad rotation
software, and thus you can't bill for them (Actually, some of
the higher-end packages try to compensate for this in various
ways. See my comparative review of
ad-management packages. It's important to compare the
traffic stats that your ad-rotation package generates to the
stats from the server log files. The former should be lower
by approximately the amount of impressions being cached. If
the discrepancy is substantially larger than this, there may
be some technical problem that you'll want to find and fix.
Visitor Browsers and Operating Systems
The more advanced analysis programs can give you a breakdown
of your visitors by browser version and/or OS. Some Web
servers keep this information in a separate log file, called
a "referrer log" (traditionally misspelled "referer").
Looking at your visitors' browser and OS versions can give
you a rough idea of how computer-savvy they are. Advanced
users tend to have the latest browsers, and are more likely
to use NT or Unix. If a large percentage of your visitors
are using old browsers, and a large percentage are coming
from AOL (see above), then you may assume that many of your
visitors are newbies. Of course, this is not absolutely
true, as many employees of large companies have no choice
but to use whatever browser and OS version their IT department
has decided to "standardize on."
As a rough guideline, however, this has two implications.
First, if a large percentage of your visitors are using older
browsers, then take it easy with advanced design techniques
like Style Sheets, Java and Javascript. Versions previous to
4.0 often choke on the latest doodads, even if you have a
script to detect the browser type. Second, if you can
get an idea of how tech-savvy your audience is, you'll know
what kind of content to concentrate on.
Insights from your Error Logs
There's gold in them there log files!
Who's sending them?
|