Readability on the Internet
December 20, 2001
|
There is a great deal written and said about development of
Internet sites, with much of the emphasis being placed on
usability, navigation, and appearance. It is now time to throw
another factor into the mix — readability.
|
It never ceases to amaze me how people can spend thousands upon
thousands of dollars for a Web site and end up with a creation
fraught with spelling errors, typos, grammatical errors, and
paragraphs that run longer than War and Peace.
One might expect to find such problems on personal Web sites, but
those same problems are just as common on corporate Web sites.
Such mistakes reflect poorly on the company, detracting from the
image the site might otherwise create.
Before I continue, let me apologize to those who use a language
other than English. The only two languages I speak, read, or
write are English and HTML; therefore this column deals strictly
with English.
I tried learning Spanish once in college, but I drove the teacher
to retirement after the first semester, so I transferred to a
basketball class where the expression, "Creek, you couldn't guard
a fence post," probably still echoes today.
The Solutions
Rather than wait until the end to provide the solutions to these
problems, I will provide some up front. One is to use spelling
and grammar checkers, such as those that come with Microsoft
Word. The other is to have more than one person proofread the
copy.
Sadly, most HTML editors come up
short regarding spell checkers, and finding grammar checkers on
such programs is virtually impossible.
Rather than toy with a company's image, it is easier and better
to write copy in an editor that has those features, then import
or copy and paste the text into an HTML editor. The only task
then remaining to ensure clean copy is to pay attention to the
HTML markup.
In addition to spelling and grammar checking, all copy should be
read by at least two people. Why do both types of checking? That
is because spell checking only checks spelling, which means it
can allow words incorrectly used to go undetected as long as they
are properly spelled.
What Are Some Of The Common Mistakes?
Two of the most frequent errors are run-on sentences and
paragraphs that seemingly never end. Both of those mistakes can
often contribute to the difficulty in reading material on the
Web.
Run-on sentences are simply two independent clauses (meaning
either could be a sentence by itself) that run together without
connecting words or punctuation. An example: Our product is
great it is the best on the market. Just the sound of the
sentence tells you something is wrong.
Correctly written, that phrase would have been either two
separate sentences or contained punctuation (such as a semi-
colon) or connecting words.
Examples of these uses are: Our product is great; it is the best
on the market. Our product is great and is the best on the
market. Our product is great, and it is the best on the market.
We are taught from the beginning that paragraphs include related
subject matter, and that is technically correct. However,
differences exist on the Internet. The reason is that the printed
word can become confusing and difficult to follow when it is
extended beyond a reasonable number of lines on the Internet.
Because of the screen width, reading on the Internet involves a
wide area for the eye to scan, and it can become difficult to
keep one's place within a long paragraph.
Therefore, it is best to break those paragraphs into two or three
shorter paragraphs to help the readers. A general guideline is to
have no more than 45-50 words per paragraph.
Another factor is the screen width for which the text was
prepared. While it is true that most monitors can display 800
pixels in width, many do not go beyond 640 pixels.
If text is written for 800 pixels, displaying it on a 640-pixel
wide monitor can create a situation where the reader must
continually scroll to the side to read the copy. Clearly, that is
not conducive to easy reading, and can turn away some readers in
a flash.
Watch These Words - Page 2
|