HTML Programs Comparison
February 16, 2000
UC is a program offering a wide variety of features, and it
pulls them off pretty well throughout.
Regardless of your HTML experience, you should be able to use
UC from Day One. The program offers a lot of extras, such as
several built-in javascripts and an image center (OK, image
centre) that enables you to preview images anywhere on your
hard drive before inserting them into your document. It also
has wizards for tables, frames, stylesheets, and multimedia
that are quite helpful.
Oddly, the program does not have much help for forms
construction. You can, in an area called "web page assistant,"
get information how to make a form, but nothing that helps
automate the process as you find with most programs.
UC allows you to drag and drop many items, such as tiles from
the file manager, and toolbars. It supports the latest
DHTML and
HTML 4.0 tags, and it
allows you to make your own custom tags.
The interface is quite adjustable but can be fairly busy without
some tweaking. The big space eater is the color picker, and
it cannot be placed elsewhere. However, you can take it off
completely and return it as needed. Were it placed on the
bottom of the screen, it would be more beneficial.
The program does a good job of internally previewing files,
and externally in both major browsers.
If you like doing your HTML coding in Notepad, you won't care
much for Under Construction, but most people will like its
features.
AE3 is another program that features a lot of customization
possibilities, and is somewhat reminiscent of Under Construction,
although its color selector is superior.
Again, it makes its toolbars extremely configurable, but it also
provides that same approach to most every other feature it offers.
When it comes time to insert a graphic, AE allows you to see
thumbnails of all graphics within a directory as opposed to others
who only let you see one graphic at a time.
Ace Expert also provides a dozen
javascripts,
five DHTML scripts,
50 java applets,
2,500 graphics,
and 20 page templates that are easily modifiable.
Again, this is a program that may not appeal to the hard-core HTML
author, but for most people Ace Expert has enough attractions to
make it well worth the price.
This is the most expensive of the programs in this review, yet
it remains less expensive than many others who are far less
powerful. It comes with several java, javascript, ActiveX and
visual basic scripts to boost your site's excitement, but the
best feature is its ease of use.
Toolbars are accessible at the top of the screen, but they do
lack the adjustability of programs that have been released more
recently.
FX does have an interesting feature in its wizard designer
that lets you insert form-type items in a document and adjust
them to fit the page as you go. It also has a wizard player
that enables you access java plugins, page wizards, and
plugin wizards.
Graphics can be previewed one at a time in a small window
directly below the index. A click of a button turns that
area into a place to see code snippets which you can save
as needed.
The program has very nice WYSIWYG table and
frames editors,
an image map creator, a GIF animator, and a graphics
optimizer all built into it.
While the program offers the usual external previewing in
both major browsers, it also offers a real-time preview in
either browser so you can show as you go.
Problems with this program have been few and far between,
making it one of the more dependable HTML authoring programs
around.
And now the ratings:
| Site Aid 2.0 and
Under Construction 98 v2.90 tie for the best of show.
SiteAid is great for those who don't want the extras; UC98 is
recommended for those who do. |
| Liquid FX 4.5 has a lot to offer, but whether it's
worth that much extra money is a matter for debate. Ace Expert
is a good program, but doesn't seem to have fluidity of use that
the others have. |
| Note Tab Pro is perhaps compared
unfairly -- it isn't designed to do all the others do in some areas,
and it does more than the others do in other areas. |
Comparison Chart with the ratings for
various areas, with 5 being
tops and 1 being the lowest:
|